<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for stale coffee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on LSG goes to WEBS by Asia</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2010/02/lsg-goes-to-webs/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Asia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/?p=289#comment-406</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I saw the mophead yarn. Damn.

The ugly, &quot;WTF&quot;-inducing yarns are almost more reason to go to WEBS than the good yarns you just want to fondle forever.

It was great meeting you and the rest of the New England LSGers as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I saw the mophead yarn. Damn.</p>
<p>The ugly, &#8220;WTF&#8221;-inducing yarns are almost more reason to go to WEBS than the good yarns you just want to fondle forever.</p>
<p>It was great meeting you and the rest of the New England LSGers as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LSG goes to WEBS by ritsuka</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2010/02/lsg-goes-to-webs/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>ritsuka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/?p=289#comment-405</guid>
		<description>I saw that turd yarn too! There were also some huge hanks of faded black cotton that looked like a box full of used mopheads, bleh. 

It was great meeting you guys. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that turd yarn too! There were also some huge hanks of faded black cotton that looked like a box full of used mopheads, bleh. </p>
<p>It was great meeting you guys. <img src='http://blog.skogul.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LSG goes to WEBS by choperena</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2010/02/lsg-goes-to-webs/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>choperena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/?p=289#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Aw man, that very last yarn in the first picture looks awesome!!! I really want some wide-banded rainbow socks, or wide-banded rainbow anything for that matter :/

And yeah, definitely turds.  I wish I could find it again, but I saw someone crochet up some cat poop on Rav last week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw man, that very last yarn in the first picture looks awesome!!! I really want some wide-banded rainbow socks, or wide-banded rainbow anything for that matter :/</p>
<p>And yeah, definitely turds.  I wish I could find it again, but I saw someone crochet up some cat poop on Rav last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In the past decade by Josie</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2010/01/in-the-past-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/?p=281#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a stressful but rewarding time....corgis and love particularly ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a stressful but rewarding time&#8230;.corgis and love particularly <img src='http://blog.skogul.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Devonian Love Affair by Sasha M.</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2009/09/devonian-love-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/?p=257#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Oh yum, that yarn is delicious, especially the burgundy/plum/pink colorway.

I think the Dunkleosteus will make an excellent tattoo.  It looks much better than the traditional carp version (and is definitely a lot more original).  Where are you planning on placing it, body-wise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yum, that yarn is delicious, especially the burgundy/plum/pink colorway.</p>
<p>I think the Dunkleosteus will make an excellent tattoo.  It looks much better than the traditional carp version (and is definitely a lot more original).  Where are you planning on placing it, body-wise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nine Inches by Skogul</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2009/08/nine-inches/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Skogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.skogul.net/?p=244#comment-329</guid>
		<description>I can easily see using the 9&quot; for a primary small diameter circular knitting project needle, honestly. While it was awkward at first and I think my first few rounds were sloppier than I&#039;d like as I was getting the feel for a different tool, I wouldn&#039;t say the circ is at all unpleasant or irritating to use. 

I end up doing a fair amount of adjusting on larger circs as well, just because I&#039;m a tight knitter and my stitches sometimes don&#039;t move as fluidly as they might. I&#039;ll probably end up using the circ as an alternative for making socks or gloves when my size 2 DPNs have something going on them.

Also, I seem to go faster with the circ than on DPNs of the same size. Probably because I&#039;m not moving between several needles as I do a round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can easily see using the 9&#8243; for a primary small diameter circular knitting project needle, honestly. While it was awkward at first and I think my first few rounds were sloppier than I&#8217;d like as I was getting the feel for a different tool, I wouldn&#8217;t say the circ is at all unpleasant or irritating to use. </p>
<p>I end up doing a fair amount of adjusting on larger circs as well, just because I&#8217;m a tight knitter and my stitches sometimes don&#8217;t move as fluidly as they might. I&#8217;ll probably end up using the circ as an alternative for making socks or gloves when my size 2 DPNs have something going on them.</p>
<p>Also, I seem to go faster with the circ than on DPNs of the same size. Probably because I&#8217;m not moving between several needles as I do a round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nine Inches by Sasha</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2009/08/nine-inches/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.skogul.net/?p=244#comment-328</guid>
		<description>My grandmother has a few of the 9&quot; Clover circs that she uses mainly for making premie hats. I agree with you that the cables are rather stiff. I can see them being very useful for things between 8&quot; and maybe 12&quot; in diameter, like hats or newborn clothes and whatnot.  For smaller items, I would imagine having to continually adjust the stitches would become tedious and irksome. 

I think I&#039;ll just stick to magic looping on my 40&quot; circs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My grandmother has a few of the 9&#8243; Clover circs that she uses mainly for making premie hats. I agree with you that the cables are rather stiff. I can see them being very useful for things between 8&#8243; and maybe 12&#8243; in diameter, like hats or newborn clothes and whatnot.  For smaller items, I would imagine having to continually adjust the stitches would become tedious and irksome. </p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll just stick to magic looping on my 40&#8243; circs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geekend (Runes of Magic) by Skogul</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2009/08/geekend-runes-of-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Skogul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 02:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.skogul.net/?p=232#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah, definitely. There&#039;s no doubt that they were not just inspired by WoW, but basically lifted a number of things seemingly directly from it. There is a little bit of an odd juxtaposition between the not-so cartoony character models and the slightly more stylized and toony environments at times.

But then again, a lot of the features that are nigh identical to Blizzard&#039;s opus are standard in any number of other MMORPGs. The combo system for rogues, for instance, is just like that of assassins in Guild Wars (except GW has it a little more nuanced than RoM and even FlyFF has a combo system for mercenaries and blades, though it&#039;s a bit different in mechanics), the rage system for warriors is similar to adrenaline for warriors and paragons in GW (I can&#039;t comment on the seal system for Knights, since I never played WoW to experience the Paladin version).

It does seem like RoM is, after borrowing so much, trying to expand on or just plain include areas and features that Blizzard neglected. Housing, crafting, dual-classing being prime examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah, definitely. There&#8217;s no doubt that they were not just inspired by WoW, but basically lifted a number of things seemingly directly from it. There is a little bit of an odd juxtaposition between the not-so cartoony character models and the slightly more stylized and toony environments at times.</p>
<p>But then again, a lot of the features that are nigh identical to Blizzard&#8217;s opus are standard in any number of other MMORPGs. The combo system for rogues, for instance, is just like that of assassins in Guild Wars (except GW has it a little more nuanced than RoM and even FlyFF has a combo system for mercenaries and blades, though it&#8217;s a bit different in mechanics), the rage system for warriors is similar to adrenaline for warriors and paragons in GW (I can&#8217;t comment on the seal system for Knights, since I never played WoW to experience the Paladin version).</p>
<p>It does seem like RoM is, after borrowing so much, trying to expand on or just plain include areas and features that Blizzard neglected. Housing, crafting, dual-classing being prime examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geekend (Runes of Magic) by Sasha</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2009/08/geekend-runes-of-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.skogul.net/?p=232#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Yay, Geekend!

After playing World of Warcraft for several years and having grown bored with it, I decided to try out RoM on your recommendation.

It plays a loooooooot like WoW, especially with the way some class mechanics are setup (the warrior rage system, the knight seals are identical to WoW&#039;s paladin seals, the rogue combo system, etc).  Although the character graphics are a lot less cartoony than WoW, the environment graphics are very similar (and I think some are taken directly from WoW).  The key shortcuts are pretty much identical as well.

That said, the differences are enough to make the game interesting enough to play without blowing it off as another WoW clone.  Being able to do more than two crafting skills is a bit of a change.  The housing system is a nice addition, although I&#039;m still learning exactly what their function is.  And of course the dual class system will be fun to play around with when I get to that point.  

It is not as polished as WoW is, but considering it&#039;s free, I&#039;m enjoying it for what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, Geekend!</p>
<p>After playing World of Warcraft for several years and having grown bored with it, I decided to try out RoM on your recommendation.</p>
<p>It plays a loooooooot like WoW, especially with the way some class mechanics are setup (the warrior rage system, the knight seals are identical to WoW&#8217;s paladin seals, the rogue combo system, etc).  Although the character graphics are a lot less cartoony than WoW, the environment graphics are very similar (and I think some are taken directly from WoW).  The key shortcuts are pretty much identical as well.</p>
<p>That said, the differences are enough to make the game interesting enough to play without blowing it off as another WoW clone.  Being able to do more than two crafting skills is a bit of a change.  The housing system is a nice addition, although I&#8217;m still learning exactly what their function is.  And of course the dual class system will be fun to play around with when I get to that point.  </p>
<p>It is not as polished as WoW is, but considering it&#8217;s free, I&#8217;m enjoying it for what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rainy Day Package by Janet</title>
		<link>http://blog.deadtrilobite.net/index.php/2009/07/rainy-day-package/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.skogul.net/?p=214#comment-314</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad you got it; I&#039;m anxious to hear what you think. For me, I loved knitting with these at first, but I&#039;m so much faster on DPNs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad you got it; I&#8217;m anxious to hear what you think. For me, I loved knitting with these at first, but I&#8217;m so much faster on DPNs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
